Sana, CAMP4
Sana Biotechnology, CAMP4 Therapeutics and Crinetics Pharmaceuticals have all used the third quarter to refocus their pipelines on the most promising candidates.
For Sana, that means halting work on a pair of HIP-modified allogeneic CAR-T cell therapies. One of these, dubbed SC291, was being evaluated in a phase 1 study for autoimmune disease, namely systemic lupus erythematosus and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. The other asset, called SC262, is a CD22-directed CAR-T Sana had been assessing in a phase 1 study for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
But Sana explained that work on the allogeneic CAR-T candidates must be sacrificed to keep funding flowing to SC451, a preclinical HIP-modified stem-cell-derived pancreatic islet cell therapy for Type 1 diabetes, as well as its fusogen platform for optimizing in vivo cell-specific delivery of genetic material.
Sana CEO Steve Harr, M.D., explained that the goal for SC451 is to become a single treatment for Type 1 diabetes that results in “normal blood glucose with no need for further insulin treatment or immunosuppression.”
“As we prioritize our SYNGAP1 lead program, we have made a strategic decision to pursue partnerships for further development of CMP-001,” CAMP4 CEO Josh Mandel-Brehm said in an earnings release.
“We continue to believe CMP-001 has potential to be the first disease-modifying therapy for the most prevalent urea cycle disorders and were encouraged by the safety and pharmacokinetics data we observed in our phase 1 SAD/MAD clinical trial,” Mandel-Brehm added.
Commenting on CAMP4’s decision, analysts at William Blair acknowledged that the phase 1 data for CMP-001 in healthy volunteers “demonstrated sound safety and pharmacokinetics.”
However, the analysts said they “view the variability in ureagenesis data as somewhat disappointing given we would like to see clinical validation that targeting RegRNA can impart pharmacodynamic changes.”
Another biopharma tweaking its pipeline yesterday was Crinetics, which has decided to take its thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) antagonist back to the drawing board. After mulling data emerging from preclinical studies, the company said it has “shifted to bringing forward an alternative candidate with a superior profile.”
Until now, the TSHR program had revolved around CRN12755, a selective oral TSHR antagonist aimed at thyroid eye disease and the autoimmune disorder Graves’ disease.
